And this was supposed to be a "rough draft."
____________________________________
A rough essay below the cut exploring the power of story to change us-- or reinforce bad ideas and omissions.
______
I draw strength from stories. Growing up, stories told me that there was another world, a more authentic life than the plastic religious-tract coated fantasyworld I could never live in handed down three times a week from the pulpit as The Truth. (That need to learn, see and speak the truth is how and why I became a writer.)
Stories gave me hope-- and stories told me that not only was the outside world a terrible place filled with people entirely unlike me--- it was also incredibly good. Stories told me there were others like me, out there in the incomprehensible vastness of a real world where life was worth living for in this moment, today, that this flawed world I was taught to fear was the most terrible thing for a theocrat-- and the most wonderful thing for me-- the real world meant freedom. Like all good things, all things worthwhile, freedom is very costly. Because it is so precious, like love, it is simultaneously one of the most sought after, treasured, misunderstood and feared things in the world.
Good stories carry a heavy responsibility for the writer. Good stories are not true; good stories make the truth, by giving others a voice and listening ear to tell them the things they know but cannot express or have not realized yet they know are true. Choose the wrong stories and they can do terrible, terrible things: reinforcing fear, anger, arrogance, greed, hatred, resentment and falsehoods. Bad stories are the tool of every fundamentalist and idealogue, who uses fiction as both blanket and blindfold from the truth.
Bad stories can tell us we're weak and need to be rescued-- or we're strong and therefore always right. Bad stories say we need the needy and the helpless to feel strong. Bad stories tell us that the world has disastrously fallen from some Great Ideal we never knew-- or that it can never change: that there is no real evolution of societies, planets and ideals toward a better state of mutual survival, and therefore we can insulate ourselves against the constant changes in us. Bad stories don't teach: they numb the reader to the idea that there's anything more to learn. Bad stories absolve us of responsibility. Bad stories pin our salvation on someone outside ourselves. Bad stories tell us the downtrodden got there of their own volition-- or, somehow worse, that they are damned by previous, outside factors to only be who and what they are at this precise moment, forevermore, with no hope of taking their own hand to change that fate.
It's no coincidence that "bad" stories are often poorly written. Badly writing is lazy, rehashing others' words and ideas; the author is either too timid or inexperienced to provide a rich and authentic tapestry of thoughts, or, at the very worst, she doesn't care. The author is lying and she knows it, because the lies provide an expedient evasion from the truth. Stock characters and socially-safe ideas emerge; nothing is questioned or closely examined, so these stories become formulaic and predictable. In creep the stereotypes and tropes: whether it's the selfless black "tank" of Hollywood who dies to save white heroes, bespectacled and socially inept scientist*, or that every "good" key female character in an action film must be the (of course heterosexual) hero's "girl". (*Really? My dad, an industrial chemist was a total wit who loved reading celebrity/political dirt in Vanity Faire and only wore glasses when he got old. Richard Feynman played bongo drums and sketched at nudie bars).
In its starkly visible omissions of complexity, bad writing rings as made-up, too-good-to-be-true-- like sales patter and political smokescreens, these stories fall short of or defy our true experiences.
But even "bad" stories, seen with open eyes, can do something good. Bad stories can warn you of a disconnect: that this sugar-fairy world or bug-eyed horror presented in them is not the world you see. Bad stories can make you ask why the people like or unlike yourself are missing from them (like why a dreamed-up and very popular contemporary fantasy of SoCal could be populated almost entirely by white people, when almost the entire state looks nothing like that! Note: that isn't a judgement against the other strengths of Joss Whedon's work; it's the "elephant in the room" of much of his past writing). Bad stories, looked at properly, can disgust you or make you ask questions or make you admit that you're not all you're cracked up to be if this kind of stuff guiltily appeals to you.
But to see bad stories for what they are, you have to listen to the real world, and also realize, however unpalatable, that those stories represent another truth that must be faced: the truth of a writer and audience's desires. And that requires experience-- going outside your comfort zone and little secure shell to see and talk with and know people, places and things quite outside yourself.
The job of every good writer is to bring these experiences home: for others who can't have them, and for others who have had them, but nobody in their world listens or talks about it. Stories can be the only refuge and comfort for the suffering, a bridge to get them to the point where they can change their world into something better. Stories can give them the strength to stand up for themselves and take risks to get to that point.
The ultimate power of stories is to open doors-- or to close them.
Fantasy has a special and often misunderstood place in this. In its purely escapist form, fantasy provides a balm for those who can't bear reality. The real world carries grief and stress and disappointments that are hard to live with and we all need this escape hatch from time to time. I haven't met anybody yet who doesn't at some point want to be somebody else, even if just for a little bit. Some writers and readers, sadly, never get past this point into making those meaningful changes to feel empowered in their own lives, and continue to live richly through make-believe instead.
But good fantasy does a lot more than that. Good fantasy gives us courage to face what we don't want to look at, by pulling it outside an all-too-painful reality and giving it a different spin. (There's a reason deeper than party politics those "Voldemort votes Republican" bumper stickers cropped up among Harry Potter fans in the USA. People recognized a nasty truth of what we Americans had become collectively as a nation-- and made a joke about it at the expense of the political machine. The snicker took a sting out of what those bumper-sticker bearers had to live with: a seemingly insurmountable foe, rooted in the culture of fear and dominance we allowed to grow. Lest you think I am soft on other political brands, see: Bad stories say we need the needy and the helpless to feel strong. Or, somehow worse, that they are damned by previous, outside factors to only be who and what they are at this precise moment, forevermore, with no hope of taking their own hand to change that fate.)
Good fantasy allows us to paint our fears into something tangible we can grasp and confront-- no matter how difficult. Good fantasy lets us see and admit and fight the dark and weak parts of ourselves... and lets us prevail. Good fantasy gives us a safe place in which to practice conflict where protagonists always prevail-- against incredible odds, stirring our emotions to resist what were once insurmountable horrors in our real world. We see ourselves in those prevailing heroes-- and if it's really good, we see our own failings amplified in the villains as well. Good fantasy tells us that all these things are a part of us-- and that the heroes can screw up, by the way, too.
Everyone, however "little" or "big" in this world has a story to contribute, and things they aren't willing to talk about as part of it. All the things I've said before are true for writers as well as readers. However, creating a story adds more personally to the process than just consuming one. Everyone makes up stories, even if they're never retold or written down. Daydreams and sex fantasies are personal stories. Fiction writers just daydream in more minute and lasting detail than other people.
Writing, and not just consuming stories, allows us to dream up better things for ourselves and other people-- to, explore what we really want, to discover that we're better people than we thought, but also to safely admit in an outside place, through characters, that we're maybe not such fabulous people, either. Writing allows you to practice not just victory, but failure. By telling stories about made-up people we writers get to share ideas and emotions. We learn to maybe go a little easier on ourselves and other people (through the flaws in our protagonists), but also, when we don't write cardboard antagonists, to explore the humanity of the unsavory and frightening parts of ourselves. Good "villains" reveal that we don't always live up to our own expectations, that we are also capable of blindness, greed, pettiness, selfishness and cruelty. When a character changes for better or for worse, it teaches us that flaws and virtues are not simple, static states. Antagonists also give us a very safe place from which to question "the rules"-- all that stuff we were taught to accept as good and proper by other people in life. There's a reason Satan/Lucifer makes such a compelling character in Western fiction. Unconstrained by "the rules", Satan lets us freely and fantastically explore what happens, good or bad, when we break them. (See "The Master and Margarita" by Mikhail Bulgakov for an excellent example of this. Written and set in Stalinist Russia-- when it was subversive to write compelling fiction about a philosopher from Galilee named Jesus, let alone the Devil-- it also happens to be one of the finest works of political satire and fantasy ever written.)
Good antagonists let us see the extreme of what we want, admit we want it-- and ask what that means, both for us and other people. Good villains teach us that our choices carry responsibility-- and, therefore, consequences. Between protagonist and antagonist, we get to work out that conflict in ourselves and admit that maybe the winning side isn't always right. We also get to explore that maybe the world isn't such a simple place to "win" or "lose" conflicts, but that life is a process of coming to understand the consequences of our daily choices, how they affect others, and what they make us. And that's really the way we resolve contradictions, conflicts and struggles.
- Mood:
impressed - Music:Michael Jackson- We Are Here To Change The World
The Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA) has launched a drive to get gamers to notify government representatives of their support for a pair of bills that would make gaming a little greener.
S.1397, or the Electronic Device Recycling Research and Development Act, would research ways to deal with the proper disposal of electronic devices, while S.1696, or the Green Gaming Act of 2009, would require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study of videogame consoles energy efficiency.
The ECA’s letter states:
While I enjoy spending some of my free time playing video games, I also would like my hobby to be “greener,” and these bills would both help to that end. Both S. 1397 and S. 1696 are needed steps to insure that my hobby of video games continues to improve as an environmentally sensitive hobby.
Participants can input their information and send off a letter to their Senator via a simple form on the ECA website.
Image via Green Today Magazine, which has a rundown on the average energy consumption of a variety of videogame consoles.
Disclosure: GamePolitics is a publication of The ECA.
Simon Reynolds is one of my favourite writers. It’s funny, really: I agree with what he writes maybe half the time, at best, but he says it so fucking well, and in such a way that I always have to think about the subject again.
He’s now doing notes on the decade at the Guardian, beginning with a piece on "beard rock." I was, I admit, hoping for a clue as to why I find Will Oldham so inexplicably creepy, but, you know, it’s a fun piece anyway:
(Automatically crossposted from warrenellis.com. Feel free to comment here or at my internet church at Whitechapel. If anything in this post looks weird, it's because LJ is run on steampipes and rubber bands -- please click through to the main site.)…beardedness is tantamount to a visual rhetoric, almost a form of authentication, as though the band are wearing their music on their faces…
So, one week later. Copies of SHIVERING SANDS are now starting to arrive with people — I found this on Kat Foisy’s blog this morning:
(If you want to send me a photo of you posing with SHIVERING SANDS? Email it to my dump address at warrenellis [at] gmail dot com, along with your website address or twitter ID or whatever, and I’ll run it and your link here)
A week since launch of the book. We’ve sold, I believe, a little over four hundred copies. Given that the production of the book involved 1) me culling from seven years of jabbering and sticking it all into a couple of RTF files 2) Ariana flowing all that into a single file and spending a couple months’ worth of spare moments fiddling with it 3) Ariana uploading the thing, ordering a proof and spending an hour checking it over… we were well into any definition of profit by the end of day one.
It is, of course, the long game that pays off. It’s interesting to look at the first week, but it’s not defining.
A persistent criticism of my interest in POD has been that only writers at my level of cultural awareness can make any kind of success out of it. And some of them will now be saying, well, even Warren Ellis can only move 400 copies in the first week of a POD project. But, for one thing, it is about the long game. For everybody. The book doesn’t go away. And, for another, if I’m not aware enough of you to order that POD project — whose fault is that, really? Because, I’ve got to tell you, I wasn’t born with a book deal in one hand and an exclusive comics contract wrapped around my other flipper. Hell, when I was starting out, there wasn’t even an internet.
SHIVERING SANDS is published through Lulu.
(Automatically crossposted from warrenellis.com. Feel free to comment here or at my internet church at Whitechapel. If anything in this post looks weird, it's because LJ is run on steampipes and rubber bands -- please click through to the main site.)- Mood:
determined - Music:Econoline Crush- All That You Are
Me: Ugh I have to remind myself that I CAN NOT MISS A WEEK OF SCHOOL to do this.
J: PFFT are you kidding?! YOU CAN TOTALLY MISS A WEEK OF SCHOOL FOR THIS!
Me: WELL NOW YOU FUCKING TELL ME UGH
Ugh I wish more than 20 seconds next to the computer screen at a time. :/
Washington Post Culture Columnist Marybeth Hicks’ latest column calls on Americans to reject violent videogames.
“Tuesday was one of those days when the news can confuse us,” the columnist writes, imparting her take on the release date of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 falling on the same day that a memorial service for the victims of the Fort Hood tragedy aired on television.
MW2 is poised to become the largest media launch in entertainment history, to which Hicks says, “We ought not be surprised, but we ought to be concerned.” She calls the title, “Another immersive first-person game offering players the chance to vicariously participate in acts of violence for the sole purpose of ... entertainment.”
Depictions of “senseless” violence can be found in many forms of American media, writes Hicks, including television and movies, but “worst of all” in videogames, which enable “a realistic experience of ‘the thrill of the kill.’”
She finishes:
It's not maturity that's needed to play these games. It's maturity that rejects them as barbaric and harmful to the psyche of anyone who would play them.
According to Hicks’ bio, she began her career as a writer of special correspondence and talking points for President Reagan. In addition to her columnist duties she is a motivational speaker and the author of several books, including Bringing Up Geeks: How to Protect Your Kid’s Childhood in a Grow-Up-Too-Fast World.
So, anyone have a rough date (or exact?) for when Christmas ceased to be a holiday in Scotland? (I imagine that before the schisms of the 16th century, the Church mandated some sort of service for the ChristMass at least).
2 lbs of lean ground beef browned and drained
1 large onion or two small coursely chopped or quartered and split
2 bell peppers (I used red and green, but yellow or orange are nice too) coarsely chopped.
1 jalapeno sliced, seeds in (because we like it hot)
If you like it really hot, add one hot banana (cubanelle) pepper too.
1 can of diced tomatoes
2 cans of tomato sauce
1 can of red kidney beans
1 bottle of Heinz Chili sauce
1/2 pound of white mushrooms sliced
1 teaspoon of cayenne pepper
Dried chili peppers to taste
2 tbsp of chili powder
1 tsp of onion powder
1 tsp of celery salt
Pepper to taste
Sometimes I throw in a can of kernel corn as well if there is one in the cupboard.
On medium or low all day (depending on what your "day" length is) and it's perfect, serve with texas toast, garlic bread, or dinner rolls. It's also nice over rice or nachos. This recipe has evolved in my house over the years because i was tired of chili that tasted like spaghetti sauce with kidney beans and chili powder. The flavour is hot and tangy, and it has a chunky consistency. In the crock pot the flavours soak through everything, and it's yummy. Enjoy!
( We don't have to do the tourist thing, really. )
I’ve been thinking about how so many self-help books begin with “How to…” Consider these examples:
- How to Win Friends and Influence People
- How to Raise the Perfect Dog
- How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth
- How to Stop Worrying and Start Living
- How to Lie with Statistics
… and there are many, many more. But to the best of my knowledge, no one has written a book on How to Become a Christian Mystic. I wonder if such a book would be useful to people.
One of the pleasures of blogging about mysticism is that from time to time I hear from people who confidently proclaim that they are mystics.
Part of me is curious, when I hear from such a person, as to how they got to be a mystic. And another part of me really doesn’t want to know.
In the Neopagan world, among so-called traditionalist witches it is considered bad form to call yourself a witch if you have not been duly initiated by another witch, which usually only will happen after a period of study. Likewise, a person who goes around saying that he or she is a shaman often will find little or no respect from those who have spent years studying with indigenous healers and spiritual guides. Meanwhile, in the Catholic Church one does not declare oneself to be a saint — sainthood is only conferred to those who have been canonized by the Pope.
The common theme, here, is that there seems to be a difference between using a word to describe oneself, and then actually doing the hard work and the inner transformation that such a word points to. Talk is cheap. I can call myself a witch or a shaman or a druid or a saint, and people will laugh at me behind my back. Or, I can live the life of sanctity or wisdom or spiritual transformation and not spend too much time worrying about what you call it.
I think mysticism works the same way. So this question: “how do I become a mystic?” is, paradoxically, best answered in a zen-like way: “Forget about it!”
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with wanting to be a mystic. In fact, I would feel far better if someone wrote to me and said “I would like to be a mystic” rather than simply tell me that they already are one. I think there’s something natural about learning of the extraordinary lives of great contemplatives and visionaries like Julian of Norwich or Teresa of Avila and thinking, “Gee, I would like my life to follow a similar course.” After all, one of the reasons why saints are saints is because their lives are worthy of imitation. I think the same holds true for the great mystics.
So while the initial motivation for asking “How do I become a mystic?” is, I believe, both understandable and laudable, almost as soon as the question is asked we are faced with the paradox I mentioned above: that the last thing you want to do is say you already are one. Throwing the word around doesn’t make it so. Deciding you want to go to medical school does not make you a doctor. Feeling an inner call to the life of holiness and contemplation is a beautiful thing. But especially at first, it is a fragile and vulnerable thing, and we need to protect it and nurture it and provide it with shelter and nutrients so that the calling can find its strength. If as soon as we discern the call to a contemplative life we begin to buffet it with the gale-force winds of empty words and ego-driven need for status and specialness, we will likely kill the vocation, like uprooting a seedling before it has a chance to set down firm roots.
So how does someone like you or me nurture a call to become a mystic? If we feel like we want to be mystics, what is the first thing we should do? My sense is that, instead of using the words “mystic” and “mysticism,” we should begin by making sure we understand them. When I think of mysticism, what am I thinking of? Holiness? Sanctity? God-intoxication? Profound silence and solitude? Charismatic or miraculous experiences? Visions and voices? A commitment to daily practices such as contemplative prayer, the Daily Office, and lectio divina? Or just a warm, fuzzy sense that God is present in my life and loves me?
What is the relationship between being a Christian mystic and being the member of a community of faith, such as a church, or house church, or centering prayer group, or prayer & praise meeting, or monastic oblate association? I personally think that you can’t be a mystic without being embedded in community — even the great mystic hermits and solitaries, like the desert fathers and mothers, or Julian of Norwich, or the mature Thomas Merton, lived out their vocation of solitude with ties to community or church in some form. But maybe you have a different notion. After all, our culture is one that mistrusts community, lionizing the individual over the group. So many people might think a mystic is some sort of Christian individualist, with a cool connection with God that is unencumbered by the messy demands of other people. I personally think that such a notion is way off-base, reflecting the values of the world rather than the values of heaven. But my point here is that you need to know exactly what it is you are trying to be with your spiritual life.
So once we have figured out what we understand mysticism to be, then comes the question of how do we make it real in our own lives? There is no “mystic school” in the sense that there is medical school or law school. Traditionally, people went to monasteries to pursue the contemplative life, and perhaps that is your call. In fact, if you are single and the member of a church with monasteries, I would commend to you the process of discerning whether the consecrated life might be for you. But for many of us, monastic life is not an option. So what do we do?
If you want to pray, then pray. If you want to be holy, then begin to make virtue a priority in your life. If you want to meditate, then meditate. If you want to grow in love of neighbor, then immerse yourself in community. If you want to experience God, then perhaps you need to do all of the above!
And so this is the real kicker: the most reliable path to becoming a mystic is, simply, the path of following Christ. Like Evangelicals, we need to accept Christ as our Lord and Savior. Like Catholics, we need to make Communion a priority. Like Lutherans, we need to nurture our faith. Like the Orthodox, we need to make sure the name of Jesus is always on our lips. We need to read the Gospels and make the stories of this wild carpenter-turned-rabbi part of our daily lives. We need to go and do what he said. We need to make his mind our mind, and open our hearts to his heart. We need to be so focussed on Christ (instead of ourselves) that we stop worrying about whether we are mystics or not.
And once that happens, we will have begun the journey.
Oh, one final word: I really don’t mean to slam people who call themselves mystics. Ours is a culture of flash and show, and so I think it is normal to want to claim something special for our identity. But I do think it would be more useful — and more rewarding in the long run — to let the words go and simply focus on being who we believe God wants us to be. And then others can decide what to call us.


San Diego has a walkway dedicated to "The Greatest Generation." More pics of that and the adjacent USS Midway here.

- Mood:
calm
So, if you put Michelle on Sesame Street talking about eating healthy & planting your own garden, you get very close to awesomeness overload...but it's well worth it!
As you'll see, Michelle not only loves vegetables, but they love her, too! :-)
The only thing I think that would have made this clip any better is if she & Big Bird did the fist bump! ;-)
- Mood:
thoughtful
I am really not too sure this will come to a vote, despite said agreement (words in Albany mean nothing at all). What it basically comes down to is that these children are too scared to go on record supporting or not supporting gay marriage. On the republican side, those that would side with us have been scared off by the vote in Maine and by a pro-gay marriage republican who got more or less got booted out of the party in the 23rd district for not being conservative enough. On the democratic side (the controlling side at the moment) of the aisle, well, all they really want is LGBT money, not to actually get us rights or anything. They will probably hold up voting on this bill, then ask us for more campaign donations 'cause it will happen for sure next session, honestly, we promise.
Meanwhile, the one man in NY who I think truly gives a shit about us, that being Gov. Patterson, is not being vocally supported for reelection by LGBT groups because his poll numbers are so low that it'd be considered a waste of time to support him as he won't make it past the party primary next year (the reasons behind that are another story entirely).
I apologize for the rant. Long and short is that sometime in the next 1.5 months, NYS Senate will vote to allow gay marriage. It's looking like right now anyway that it will fail, but in this state, for the senate to merely function as a voting government body would be a step up.
- Mood:
aggravated
Was summoned for reserve duty at the base. FREAKED OUT FOR 20 MINUTES. Reminded myself I am NOT ALLOWED TO MISS AN ENTIRE WEEK OF SCHOOL just to do this. Signed up for the entire 4 days of my weekend instead.
Am still freaking out like HELL. Also have no idea how I'm going to tell my mom about this. SHE is going to have one massive freak out in a very non positive way. Seriously no idea how I'm going to break the news.
Yeah but seriously OW MY BACK HURTS :(

